Blue Work / Red Work

SRE Through the Lens of 'Red Work' and 'Blue Work'


L. David Marquet's "Leadership is Language" offers a fresh perspective on leadership and collaboration in the modern workplace. Central to his thesis is the distinction between 'Red Work' and 'Blue Work'. Red Work is the doing—execution-focused tasks that are procedural and have a clear start and finish. Blue Work, on the other hand, is the thinking—it's about decision-making, planning, and strategizing. When we apply this dichotomy to Site Reliability Engineering (SRE), a discipline that bridges software development and operations, we gain unique insights into the roles and responsibilities of SRE teams.


1. Red Work in SRE: Execution at its Best


Red Work represents the tasks that are about execution, production, and getting things done. In the world of SRE, this translates to:






2. Blue Work in SRE: The Thinking Behind the Doing


While Red Work is crucial, it's the Blue Work that often defines the success of SRE teams. This involves:







3. Balancing Red and Blue Work in SRE


For SRE teams to be effective, a balance between Red and Blue Work is essential. While the execution (Red Work) ensures that systems remain operational and reliable, it's the thinking (Blue Work) that drives continuous improvement, innovation, and adaptability.




L. David Marquet's distinction between Red Work and Blue Work offers a valuable lens to understand the multifaceted roles and responsibilities of Site Reliability Engineers. While the execution-driven Red Work keeps the digital wheels turning, it's the strategic Blue Work that ensures that SRE practices evolve, adapt, and continue to deliver value in an ever-changing tech landscape. For organizations and SRE leaders, recognizing the importance of both, and ensuring that teams have the time, tools, and culture to engage in both, is the key to long-term reliability and resilience.